The Story Of A Man, A Land and A Love!
Release Date: 1960-12-01
Runtime: 147 mins
The epic story of a family involved in the Oklahoma Land Rush of April 22, 1889.
147 minutes
1960-12-01
$6,000,000
$11,000,000
Year:
1932
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Year:
1932
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Year:
1932
Status:
🏆 Won
Year:
1932
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Year:
1932
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Year:
1932
Status:
🏆 Won
Year:
1932
Status:
🏆 Won
Year:
1961
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Year:
1961
Status:
🎭 Nominated
Read authentic reviews from real viewers about this movie.
See reviews ▼"Thinking as I have, upon seeing the two versions (on consecutive days) depicting the fourth (from April 22, 1889) of the five Oklahoma land rushes, I have to reconsider my initial impression that the 1931 film was marginally better than this, Mann's 1960 version. I realize I'm not a member of the Glenn Ford Fan Club by any stretch of the imagination, but his co-stars are WAY better, and in Anthony Mann, you find a master of both the Western and the epic format (his later 'The Fall of the Roman Empire' is one of my favourite films from the 60's). A jar of beeswax could have out-acted Richard Dix's performance in the original (it's a dirty rotten shame HE even got nominated for Best Actor, in a year when MANY outstanding actors were overshadowed, not being so honoured), but I have to admit Ford was good, even if IMHO he didn't deserve the honour of being front-and-center of a 2 1/2 hour epic, and you can't beat what Maria Schell, Anne Baxter, Harry Morgan and Vic Morrow--just to name a select few--brought to the picture. Some scenes in the 1931 original still work better, but overall I believe this is one case in which the remake is better than the original. I further would insist that had Mann not been fired and replaced by Charles Walters, it would have been a minor masterpiece."
"Thinking as I have, upon seeing the two versions (on consecutive days) depicting the fourth (from April 22, 1889) of the five Oklahoma land rushes, I have to reconsider my initial impression that the 1931 film was marginally better than this, Mann's 1960 version. I realize I'm not a member of the Glenn Ford Fan Club by any stretch of the imagination, but his co-stars are WAY better, and in Anthony Mann, you find a master of both the Western and the epic format (his later 'The Fall of the Roman Empire' is one of my favourite films from the 60's). A jar of beeswax could have out-acted Richard Dix's performance in the original (it's a dirty rotten shame HE even got nominated for Best Actor, in a year when MANY outstanding actors were overshadowed, not being so honoured), but I have to admit Ford was good, even if IMHO he didn't deserve the honour of being front-and-center of a 2 1/2 hour epic, and you can't beat what Maria Schell, Anne Baxter, Harry Morgan and Vic Morrow--just to name a select few--brought to the picture. Some scenes in the 1931 original still work better, but overall I believe this is one case in which the remake is better than the original. I further would insist that had Mann not been fired and replaced by Charles Walters, it would have been a minor masterpiece."
The movie is approximately 147 minutes long.
1960-12-01 marks the official release date of the movie.
The movie belongs to the Western genres, offering a variety of experiences from adventure to fantasy.
The lead actors include Glenn Ford , Maria Schell , and Anne Baxter , among others.
The movie was directed by Anthony Mann Anthony Mann Ridgeway Callow Ridgeway Callow Hank Moonjean
The movie had an estimated budget of $6,000,000 .
A Cinderella Story grossed an estimated $11,000,000 at the box office.
Major production companies include Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer .